Skip navigation
FACT
Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies

Analysis of incident reports on forgotten needles in acupuncture treatment

Yamashita H1,2, Tsukayama H1, Sugishita C2
1Tsukuba College of Technology Clinic, 4–12–7 Kasuga, Tsukuba, 305–0821, Japan
2Department of Family Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Japan

Objective

To find clues as to necessary precautions against acupuncturists’ negligence.

Materials and methods

At our clinic, we made a rule that incidents during and after acupuncture treatment sessions had to be reported. We defined ‘incident’ not only as an adverse event that actually occurred, but also as an event that nearly occurred. During the 10 months from April 2000 to January 2001, 8908 treatment sessions were performed, and 35 incident reports of forgotten needles after needle-retention technique were recorded. We analysed these reports.

Results

Seventeen acupuncturists out of 29 were responsible for the incidents. In two cases, the retained needles were found at the patient’s home or in the patient’s car. Other cases were ‘near misses’ or actually occurred during practice. The needles were found mainly in the lower extremities or the head, where they had been hidden by a towel or the hair. In nine cases, the acupuncturists that caused the incidents were acting on behalf of the acupuncturist that had inserted the needles. In July, August, December and January, when the acupuncturists had no teaching duties, the incidence was remarkably lower (0.11%, 0.22%, 0.11% and 0.13%, respectively) compared with the overall incidence (0.39%). The Yatabe–Gilford test showed no characteristic personality of repeaters.

Conclusion

The results suggest that forgotten needles occur because of lack of concentration, communication and confirmation.

Top | Next: Volume 7:2»
© Pharmaceutical Press 2008
Accessibility | Terms and Conditions