Skip navigation
FACT
Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies

Cultural differences in the placebo effect

Grundmann N1, Lüdtke R2, Kübler J3, Weihrauch T3, Thürmann PA1
1Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, HELIOS Hospital Wuppertal, University Witten/Herdecke, Germany
2Karl and Veronica Carstens Foundation, Essen, Germany
3Bayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany

Objective

The so-called placebo effect includes, underlying other factors, psycho-sociological aspects. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether and to what extent this leads to different effects between cultures in placebo treated patients.

Materials and methods

Individual data from the placebo groups of 68 RCTs (nine multinational) were analysed regarding efficacy and safety parameters. All trials were conducted by Bayer AG, Germany, and dealt with (a) metrifonate in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), (b) nimodipine in sub-arachnoidal haemorrhage, or (c) acarbose in diabetes. All analyses were adjusted for duration and severity of the disease and other potential confounders.

Results

(a) For the ADAS-Cog (AD subscale), the deterioration under placebo when compared with baseline in German patients was larger than in Austria (difference after 182 days: 3.2 score points, 95% CI 0.8–5.7, P = 0.0097) and the UK (2.9 points, 95% CI 0.3–5.5, P = 0.0267). (b) Large inter-country variations of changes in the Barthel score can be found (P < 0.001): adjusted for baseline Australian placebo-treated patients had the best, and South African and Singaporean patients the poorest outcome, (c) Gastrointestinal adverse events under placebo ranged from 7.7% (Greece) to 37.0% (Litavia) within the first 30 days.

Conclusion

The observed large differences between countries may be associated with different levels of health care (e.g. in subarachnoidal haemorrhages) or different reporting habits (e.g. in safety aspects). Nevertheless, a high variability between countries and cultures could be observed for the placebo-effect size and may be of relevance for multinational clinical trials.

Top | Next: Long-term follow up of acupuncture and homoeopathy treatment in general practice»
© Pharmaceutical Press 2008
Accessibility | Terms and Conditions