Skip navigation
FACT
Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies

Homoeopathic care and prevention of upper respiratory tract infections in children

Steinsbekk A1, Fønnebø V2, Lewith G3, Bentzen N1
1Department of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
2National Centre for Research in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, University of Tromsø, Norway
3Complementary Medicine Research Unit, Primary Medical Care, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Objective

This study investigated the effect of individualised treatment by homoeopaths in preventing childhood upper respiratory tract infection (URTI).

Materials and methods

One hundred and sixty-nine children below the age of 10 participated in this pragmatic RCT. The children were randomly assigned either to receive homoeopathic care or to a waiting list control using self-selected conventional health care. The participants were recruited by post from children previously diagnosed with URTI. The outcome related to the prevention of new episodes of URTI was measured with mean total symptom score over 12 weeks.

Result

The average number of consultations was 2.9 (SD 0.6, range 1–4). The homoeopaths prescribed 22 different homoeopathic medicines. There was a significant difference in the predefined main outcome in favour of homoeopathy (24, 95% CI 11–36) compared to the control group (44, 95% CI 32–61) (P = 0.026, Mann–Whitney non-parametric test). The difference in mean number of days with URTI symptoms was statistically significant with 8 days (95% CI 4–12) in the homoeopathy group and 13 days (95% CI 9–15) in the control group (P = 0.006, Mann–Whitney non-parametric test). There was no statistical difference in the use of conventional medication or care between the two groups.

Conclusion

In this study there was a clinically relevant effect of individualised homoeopathic care in the prevention of URTI in children. The study gives no data on the specific effect of homoeopathic medicines or the homoeopath.

Funding

Norwegian Research Council.

Top | Next: Are randomised trials valid externally? A comparison of patient characteristics and outcomes in an observational study and a randomised trial of acupuncture in patients with migraine»
© Pharmaceutical Press 2008
Accessibility | Terms and Conditions